Audio Editing Can Harm

Posted in Legal Information - Criminal Law

Audio Editing Can Harm Your Evidence
Author: Audio Expert

When I first began my career as an audio engineer, we used analogue recording tape in the form of reel-to-reel, cassette and eight tracks. The tape for reel- to- reel moved across an erase head, then a record head then playback head on professional recorders. It traveled from left to right. Tape width varied from ¼ ", ½", 1" and 2". Editing of these tapes required a razor blade, splicing tape and an edit block to help make the tape splice consistent before you used the splice tape to put the recording back together.

Cassette tapes traveled the same direction (left to right) except the tape width was much smaller as were the channel. Cassette tapes were hard to edit but editing was possible. In fact, the same manufacturers of reel-to-reel editing tools also made cassette editing tools.

This is where my forensic career began. People would edit the original cassette recording then make a copy of the edited cassette claiming it to be the original. Audio forensic experts would have to examine the cassette (that was claimed to be an original) to determine and establish authenticity.

Today, audio authentication is much more difficult because of digital audio recordings. However, with the help of an audio expert, the authentication can be established.

If you have a recording contained on a digital pocket recorder, more than likely the recording is complete and represents the facts as they occurred. Many police agencies use Olympus digital pocket recorders to document confessions and to record undercover investigations.

More than likely these digital recorders do not have editing capability so their audio recordings can be assumed authentic. However, experts in fraud can and will find ways to alter digital audio recordings regardless of the circumstances.

One of the activities an audio forensic expert executes to determine if an audio recording is original is to discover what the original audio recording was created on. If the recording was created on a computer (for example) then the computer that created the original audio recordings must be present for examination. This is the easiest way to determine fraud.

If the original recording equipment is no longer available, then the forensic expert must use visual display and electronic measurement to determine and establish authenticity.

Audio authentication is much more difficult today than it was back in the days of analogue recorders. Authentication is still necessary in litigation because alteration of the original conversations as they occurred can lead to litigation outcomes that are altered from their true justice.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/audio-editing-can-harm-your-evidence-5160766.html

About the Author

800-647-4281 As an audio-video forensics expert, I have analyzed hundreds of audio recordings for authentication, clarification and voice identification in both analogue and digital formats. When analyzing audio recordings, I use a three prong approach. First, I use skills learned from 30+ years as an audio engineer where I specialized in spoken word recordings. I developed my critical listening skills while recording and editing hundreds of hours of voice recordings. During the same time, I was trained by the senior engineering staff about noise reduction, equalization and acoustics.